Edward Reeder v. State of Florida
This text of Edward Reeder v. State of Florida (Edward Reeder v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-190 _____________________________
EDWARD REEDER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
October 28, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Edward Reeder, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward Reeder v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-reeder-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.