EDWARD R. BROWN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2021·No. 21-0903·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0903 Lower Tribunal No. F14-700 ________________

Edward R. Brown, Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Edward R. Brown, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) ("The

remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court

pursuant to rule 3.850.") (citation omitted); Mills v. Dugger, 574 So. 2d 63,

65 (Fla. 1990) ("[H]abeas corpus is not to be used `for obtaining additional

appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct

appeal ... or which could have, should have, or have been raised in' prior

postconviction filings.") (citation omitted); Brown v. State, No. 3D20-1939

(Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 24, 2021) (denying postconviction appeal of ineffective

assistance of trial counsel); Brown v. State, No. 3D21-56 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb.

3, 2021) (denying postconviction appeal raising other grounds).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARD R. BROWN v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

EDWARD R. BROWN v. State (EDWARD R. BROWN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Mills v. Dugger
574 So. 2d 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)