Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
781 F.3d 1106, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4941, 2015 WL 1381752
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2015·No. 10-56971·Published·Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this *1107-1119 case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion and order denying motions to intervene shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego, 781 F.3d 1106, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4941, 2015 WL 1381752 (9th Cir. 2015).
781 F.3d 1106 (Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pham v. Jaddou
S.D. California, 2024
Rogers v. Grewal
140 S. Ct. 1865 (Supreme Court, 2020)
United States v. Alonzo Adams
914 F.3d 602 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)
Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
824 F.3d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Grace v. District of Columbia
187 F. Supp. 3d 124 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Chesney v. City of Jackson
171 F. Supp. 3d 605 (E.D. Michigan, 2016)
Wrenn v. District of Columbia
167 F. Supp. 3d 86 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Grigol Abroyan v. Loretta E. Lynch
615 F. App'x 397 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Bonidy v. United States Postal Service
790 F.3d 1121 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
788 F.3d 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
Powell v. Tompkins
783 F.3d 332 (First Circuit, 2015)