Edward Niewinski v. United States

230 F.2d 606
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 1956
Docket12556_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 F.2d 606 (Edward Niewinski v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Niewinski v. United States, 230 F.2d 606 (6th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the district court’s judgment of conviction upon a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of violating 18 U.S.CA. § 659, and of having unlawfully conspired to violate said section, was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties,

And the court being of the opinion that there was substantial credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and that therefore the trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; and the court also being of the opinion that in instructing the jury the trial court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Niewinski
191 F. Supp. 272 (D. Minnesota, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F.2d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-niewinski-v-united-states-ca6-1956.