Edward Niewinski v. United States

230 F.2d 606

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the district court’s judgment of conviction upon a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of violating 18 U.S.CA. § 659, and of having unlawfully conspired to violate said section, was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties,

And the court being of the opinion that there was substantial credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and that therefore the trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; and the court also being of the opinion that in instructing the jury the trial court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.