Home/D.C. Circuit/Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.

Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.

289 F.2d 902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 1961
Docket16060
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 289 F.2d 902 (Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co., 289 F.2d 902 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not “interfere” with Meeker’s business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.

We accept the trial court’s interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Khalsa v. Levinson
2003 NMCA 018 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2002)
Kociolek v. Hagmann
678 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1988)
Gaylord Broadcasting Co., Cross-Appellee v. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp., Lynn Gansar, Cross-Appellant
746 F.2d 251 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
Davis v. Buckham
421 A.2d 427 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Economics Laboratory, Inc. v. Donnolo
612 F.2d 405 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
APPALACHIAN CONTRACTING COMPANY v. Cox
403 F. Supp. 176 (E.D. Tennessee, 1975)
American Bible Society v. Blount
446 F.2d 588 (Third Circuit, 1971)
American Bible Society, a Nonprofit Organization of the State of New York v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 46-69) American Book-Stratford Press, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 941-68) Montville Warehousing Company, Inc., a Mew Jersey Corp. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1120-68) American Book Publishers Council, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1194-68) Associated Book Service, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1332-68) Scholastic Magazines, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1407-68) the MacMillan Company v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1408-68) Wayne Warehousing Corp. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, (d.c. Civil Action No. 1358-68) Prentice Hall Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States, Joseph Thomas, Postmaster, Englewood, New Jersey, (d.c. Civil Action No. 102-69) Harper & Row Publishers, Incorporated v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States and Bernard J. Harding, Scranton, Pa., Postmaster, (d.c. Civil Action No. 469-69) Haddon Craftsmen, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States and Bernard J. Harding, Scranton, Pa., Postmaster, (d.c. Civil Action No. 470-69) Regensteiner Publishing Enterprises, Inc., and Chicago Book Manufacturing, Inc. v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States and Henry McGee Postmaster of the United States Post Office at Chicago, Illinois, (d.c. Civil Action No. 472-69) National Book Company of Scranton v. Winton M. Blount, Postmaster General of the United States and Bernard J. Harding, Scranton, Pa., Postmaster, (d.c. Civil Action No. 551-69)
446 F.2d 588 (Third Circuit, 1971)
United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America
317 F. Supp. 1070 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Hayes v. Altman
266 A.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
John A. Metheany v. United States
390 F.2d 559 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Finance Company, Seaboard Finance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross
367 F.2d 646 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
C-E-I-R, Inc. v. Computer Dynamics Corp.
183 A.2d 374 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1962)
Jamaica Lodge 2188 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
200 F. Supp. 253 (E.D. New York, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-m-stuart-and-the-john-e-stuart-company-v-theodore-c-meeker-cadc-1961.