Edward M. Johnson v. State
This text of Edward M. Johnson v. State (Edward M. Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State of TexasAppellee/s
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 21, 2014
No. 04-14-00024-CR
Edward M. JOHNSON, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1998CR6320 Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding
ORDER On December 6, 2013, this court denied Edward M. Johnson’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus in original proceeding number 04-13-00808-CR. In our December 11, 2013 opinion, we explained our reasoning. On January 8, 2014, Appellant filed a pro se “Notice of Appeal,” and we opened appeal number 04-14-00024-CR. Because the notice complains of this court’s denial of Johnson’s petition for writ of mandamus, we construe it as a motion for rehearing of our December 6, 2013 order and our December 11, 2013 opinion in original proceeding 04-13-00808-CR. Therefore, we DIRECT the Clerk of this court to administratively close appeal number 04-14-00024-CR and file petitioner’s January 4, 2014 motion for rehearing (titled “Notice of Appeal”) as a motion for rehearing of original proceeding number 04-13-00808-CR.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of January, 2014.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward M. Johnson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-m-johnson-v-state-texapp-2014.