Edward L. Stokes v. United States Lines Company
This text of 371 F.2d 830 (Edward L. Stokes v. United States Lines Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
371 F.2d 830
Edward L. STOKES, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 10589.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued November 2, 1966.
Decided February 6, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Walter E. Hoffman, Judge.
Calvin W. Breit, Norfolk, Va. (C. Arthur Rutter, Jr., and Amato, Babalas, Breit, Cohen, Rutter & Friedman, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.
William B. Eley, Norfolk, Va. (Rixey & Rixey, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon careful consideration of the record we conclude that the verdict of the jury was permissible under the evidence and should not be disturbed. We perceive no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 F.2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-l-stokes-v-united-states-lines-company-ca4-1967.