Edward L. Stokes v. United States Lines Company

371 F.2d 830
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1967·No. 10589·Published

Opinion

371 F.2d 830

Edward L. STOKES, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 10589.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued November 2, 1966.

Decided February 6, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Walter E. Hoffman, Judge.

Calvin W. Breit, Norfolk, Va. (C. Arthur Rutter, Jr., and Amato, Babalas, Breit, Cohen, Rutter & Friedman, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.

William B. Eley, Norfolk, Va. (Rixey & Rixey, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration of the record we conclude that the verdict of the jury was permissible under the evidence and should not be disturbed. We perceive no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward L. Stokes v. United States Lines Company, 371 F.2d 830 (4th Cir. 1967).

371 F.2d 830 (Edward L. Stokes v. United States Lines Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.