Edward L. Martin v. United States

271 F.2d 499, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3290
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 8, 1959·No. 15152_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the case on the merits satisfies us that the appeals as to Counts 1 and 4 are plainly without merit and since the sentences imposed on Counts 1 and 4 are concurrent with those imposed on Counts 9 and 11, we need not reach appellant’s claims with respect to the latter.

*500 The appeal at government expense was improvidently granted and should now be dismissed as frivolous. It is so ordered. 1

Appeal dismissed as frivolous.

WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge, would affirm rather than dismiss.

1

. In view of this action we should note that defense counsel advises us that although privately engaged, he has acted on this appeal without compensation; he has ably presented all aspects of the case for our consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward L. Martin v. United States, 271 F.2d 499, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3290 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

271 F.2d 499 (Edward L. Martin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.