Edward L. Martin v. United States
This text of 271 F.2d 499 (Edward L. Martin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Our review of the case on the merits satisfies us that the appeals as to Counts 1 and 4 are plainly without merit and since the sentences imposed on Counts 1 and 4 are concurrent with those imposed on Counts 9 and 11, we need not reach appellant’s claims with respect to the latter.
*500 The appeal at government expense was improvidently granted and should now be dismissed as frivolous. It is so ordered. 1
Appeal dismissed as frivolous.
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge, would affirm rather than dismiss.
. In view of this action we should note that defense counsel advises us that although privately engaged, he has acted on this appeal without compensation; he has ably presented all aspects of the case for our consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 F.2d 499, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 233, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-l-martin-v-united-states-cadc-1959.