Edward Joseph Osuna v. State
This text of Edward Joseph Osuna v. State (Edward Joseph Osuna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 3, 2018
NO. 03-18-00239-CR
Edward Joseph Osuna, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the judgment of conviction to reflect that the “Statute for Offense”
is “30.02(a)(3), (c)(2) Penal Code.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant
is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward Joseph Osuna v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-joseph-osuna-v-state-texapp-2018.