Edward Joseph Moya v. State
This text of Edward Joseph Moya v. State (Edward Joseph Moya v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-12-00121-CR
EDWARD JOSEPH MOYA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 276th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 17,479
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER
Edward Joseph Moya appeals from his conviction of manslaughter. The clerk’s record
was filed July 18, 2012, and the reporter’s record was filed October 1, making the appellant’s
brief due October 31. On December 10, having received nothing from appellant’s counsel, the
clerk’s office sent a late brief notice advising that the brief was late and extending the filing
deadline to December 27. On December 27, counsel for appellant filed a motion seeking an
extension of appellant’s briefing deadline. The motion was granted, and the deadline was
extended to January 3, 2013; however, the Court indicated at that time that no additional
extensions of time would be granted. On January 17, appellant’s counsel filed a second motion
to extend the deadline for filing appellant’s brief.
We have reviewed counsel’s second motion to extend and the record on appeal, and we
have been provided with no compelling information to convince us that this brief requires more
time to prepare. In accordance with our previous dictate that no additional extensions of time
would be granted, the motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief is overruled.
We order counsel to file appellant’s brief with this Court on or before February 4, 2013.
If the brief is not received by February 4, we may abate this case to the trial court for a hearing
pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(b)(2). Further, we warn appellant’s counsel that his failure to timely file appellant’s brief
may subject him to contempt proceedings.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 23, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward Joseph Moya v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-joseph-moya-v-state-texapp-2013.