Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles
This text of Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles (Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON; GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH; No. 04-55324 STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE PURRIE, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-03-01142-ER v. Central District of California, CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM Los Angeles BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK, ORDER Captain, in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. Filed October 15, 2007
Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge.
ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent
*The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
14139 14140 JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-jones-v-city-of-los-angeles-ca9-2007.