Edward James Tyson v. David Clarence Dawkins
This text of Edward James Tyson v. David Clarence Dawkins (Edward James Tyson v. David Clarence Dawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 11, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 159815 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein EDWARD JAMES TYSON, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 159815 COA: 346595 Cheboygan CC: 17-008628-NO DAVID CLARENCE DAWKINS and UNTHANK, LLC, d/b/a B.S. & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 11, 2019 s1204 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward James Tyson v. David Clarence Dawkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-james-tyson-v-david-clarence-dawkins-mich-2019.