Edward J. Farrell v. James P. Donovan

238 F.2d 38, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 177
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 25, 1956·No. 13220_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, broker in a real estate transaction, sued both purchasers and sellers for loss of his commission resulting from their cancellation of the contract. The District Court granted appellees’ motions to dismiss the complaint. This action was correct: as to the sellers, on venue grounds, since they are residents of Maryland and were served with process there; as to the purchasers, for lack of a claim upon which relief could be granted, since a purchaser is not accountable to a broker for commission, absent an understanding to that effect, Giovannoni v. Waple & James, Inc., 1939, 70 App.D.C. 229, 100 F.2d 108.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward J. Farrell v. James P. Donovan, 238 F.2d 38, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 177 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

238 F.2d 38 (Edward J. Farrell v. James P. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related