Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJune 4, 1997
Docket03A01-9607-CV-00240
StatusPublished

This text of Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc. (Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS

FILED June 4, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr. EDWARD J . EYRI NG, M D. , . ) KNOX CI RCUI T Appellate C ourt Clerk ) C. A. NO. 0 3 A0 1 - 9 6 0 7 - CV- 0 0 2 4 0 Pl a i n t i f f - Ap p e l l a n t ) ) ) ) ) ) vs . ) HON. W HEELER A ROS ENBALM ) J UDGE ) ) ) ) ) FORT SANDERS PARKW EST MEDI CAL ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED CENTER, I NC. , a n d FORT SANDERS ) ALLI ANCE, I NC. , ) ) De f e n d a n t s - Ap p e l l e e s )

J OHN K. KI NG a n d ALAN PARKER, Le wi s , Ki n g , Kr i e g , W l dr op a and Ca t r o n , Kn o x v i l l e f o r Ap p e l l a n t .

FOSTER D. ARNETT a n d RI CK POWERS, Ar n e t t , Dr a p e r a nd Ha g o o d , Kn o x v i l l e , f o r Ap p e l l e e s .

O P I N I O N

M M r r a y, c u J.

W a r e p r i ma r i l y c a l l e d u p o n i n t h i s a p p e a l t o d e c i d e wh e t h e r t h e e

Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w o f 1 9 6 7 ( T. C. A. § 63- 6- 219) ( t he La w)

g r a n t s i mmu n i t y t o h o s p i t a l s f o r a c t i ons t a ke n a ga i ns t phys i c i a ns upon r e c o mme n d a t i o n s of pe e r r e vi e w boar ds or c o mmi t t e e s . Fo r

r e a s o n s h e r e i n a f t e r s t a t e d , we b e l i e v e t h a t t h e l a w wa s i n t e n d e d t o ,

a n d d o e s , g r a n t h o s p i t a l s s u c h i mmu n i t y . W a f f i r m t h e j u d g me n t o f e

t he t r i a l c our t .

Th e pl a i nt i f f / a ppe l l a nt , Ed wa r d J . Ey r i n g , M D. , . is a l i ce ns e d

p h y s i c i a n i n t h e St a t e o f Te n n e s s e e a n d a Bo a r d Ce r t i f i e d Or t h o p e d i c

Su r g e o n . He b e c a me a me mb e r of t he me d i c a l st af f of t he

de f e nda nt / a ppe l l e e , Fo r t Sa n d e r s Pa r k we s t M di c a l e Ce n t e r i n 1974 1 ( Pa r k we s t ) . I n J u l y 1 9 9 2 , Pa r k we s t t e r mi n a t e d h i s p r i v i l e g e s . Dr .

Ey r i n g t he r e a f t e r s ue d Pa r k we s t a l l e gi ng br e a c h of c ont r a c t ,

i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e i n c ont r a c t , i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e i n a n

e xi s t i ng bus i ne s s r e l a t i ons hi p, i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e in a

pr os pe c t i ve bus i ne s s e xpe c t a nc y, a nd i nt e nt i ona l d i s c r i mi n a t o r y

i nt e r f e r e nc e in hi s r i ght to e nga ge in hi s pr of e s s i on at t he

hos pi t a l .

Th e Ci r c u i t Co u r t f o r Kn o x Co u n t y g r a n t e d t h e d e f e n d a n t s s u mma r y

j u d g me n t , hol di ng t ha t t he hos pi t a l e nj oye d i mmu n i t y under t he

i mmu n i t y p r o v i s i o n o f t h e l a w, ha d not a c t e d i n ba d f a i t h nor wa s

mo t i v a t e d b y ma l i c e , a nd had not vi ol a t e d i t s b y l a ws . Pl a i n t i f f

a ppe a l s , r a i s i n g t h e f o l l o wi n g i s s u e s :

A. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n r e f us i ng t o gr a nt h p a r t i a l s u mma r y j u d g me n t t o Pl a i n t i f f / Ap p e l l a n t u n d e r Le wi s b u r g Co mmu n i t y Ho s p i t a l v . Al f r e d s o n , 8 0 5 S. W 2 d . 7 5 6 ( Te n n . 1 9 9 1 ) o n t h e i s s u e o f c o n t r a c t l i a b i l i t y b a s e d u p o n Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l ' s v i o l a t i o n o f i t s By l a ws .

1 Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l wa s p u r c h a s e d b y Fo r t Sa n d e r s Al l i a n c e i n 1 9 9 0 a n d b e c a me k n o wn a s Fo r t Sa n d e r s Pa r k we s t M d i c a l Ce n t e r . e W her e a f t e r r e f e r t o t he hos pi t a l e a s " Pa r k we s t . "

2 B. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n f a i l i ng t o hol d h t h a t De f e n d a n t s / Ap p e l l e e s we r e n o t e n t i t l e d t o i mmu n i t y u n d e r t h e He a l t h Ca r e Qu a l i t y I mp r o v e me n t Ac t o f 1 9 8 6 , 4 2 U. S. C. § § 1 1 1 0 1 . e t s e q .

C. W e t h e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t e r r e d i n g r a n t i n g s u mma r y h j u d g me n t t o De f e n d a n t s / Ap p e l l e e s g r a n t i n g i t i mmu n i t y f r o m mo n e t a r y l i a b i l i t y u n d e r t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w, T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 .

D. W e t h e r t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w i mmu n i t y h p r o v i s i o n , T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 ( c ) ( 1 ) a p p l i e s t o h o s p i t a l s .

E. W e t h e r T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 ( c ) h p r o v i d e s i mmu n i t y f o r br e a c h of c ont r a c t .

F. W e t he r h t he t r i al c our t ' s a ppl i c a t i on of t he Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w i mp e r mi s s i b l y i n t e r f e r e s wi t h pr e e xi s t i ng cont r a c t r i ght s .

G. W e t h e r Pa r k we s t h f a i l e d t o me e t i t s bur de n of p r o v i n g t h a t i t s a c t i o n s f a l l wi t h i n t h e s t a n d a r d o f t h e Pe e r Re v i e w La w.

H. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n f a i l i ng t o hol d h t h a t Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l ' s a c t i o n s we r e n o t ma d e i n g o o d f a i t h b u t o c c u r r e d u n d e r c i r c u ms t a n c e s f r o m wh i c h l e g a l ma l i c e s h o u l d b e i n f e r r e d .

I. W e t h e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s g r a n t o f s u mma r y j u d g me n t h s h o u l d b e r e v e r s e d b e c a u s e Pl a i n t i f f / Ap p e l l a n t wa s de ni e d a n a de qua t e oppor t uni t y t o e nga ge i n di s c ove r y.

J. W e t h e r t h e Pe e r Re v i e w [ La w] s h o u l d b e n u l l i f i e d o n h t he ba s i s of t he doc t r i ne of e qui t a bl e e s t oppe l .

K. W et he r h t he r e voc a t i on of Pl a i n t i f f ' s st af f me mb e r s h i p s h o u l d b e v a c a t e d b y t h e d o c t r i n e s o f Re s J u d i c a t a a n d Co l l a t e r a l Es t o p p e l .

Al t h o u g h pl a i nt i f f e n u me r a t e s e l e ve n i s s ue s , we ar e p r i ma r i l y

c o n c e r n e d wi t h t h e a p p l i c a b i l i t y o f t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w,

t he r e f or e , we wi l l di s c us s t he i s s ue s r e l a t i ng t o i t fi rst .

THE TENNESSEE PEER REVI EW LAW OF 1 9 6 7

3 T. C. A. § 63- 6- 219 wa s e na c t e d in 1967, a nd is quot e d in its

e n t i r e t y a s f o l l o ws :

T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 . Le g i s l a t i v e pol i c y de c l a r a t i o n — M di c a l e r e v i e w c o mmi t t e e s — I mmuni t y o f me mbe r s — Co nf i de nt i a l i t y o f r e c o r ds - - Sho r t t i t l e . - - ( a ) ( 1 ) I n c o n j u n c t i o n wi t h t h e a p p l i c a b l e p o l i c i e s o f t h e He a l t h Ca r e Qu a l i t y I mp r o v e me n t Ac t o f 1 9 8 6 ( 4 2 U. S. C. § § 1 1 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 5 2 ) , i t i s t h e s t a t e d p o l i c y o f Te n n e s s e e t o e n c o u r a g e c o mmi t t e e s ma d e u p o f Te n n e s s e e ' s l i c e ns e d phys i c i a ns to c a ndi dl y, c ons c i e nt i ous l y, a nd obj e c t i ve l y e va l ua t e a nd r e vi e w t he i r pe e r s ' pr of e s s i ona l c o n d u c t , c o mp e t e n c e , a n d a b i l i t y t o p r a c t i c e me d i c i n e . Te n n e s s e e f ur t he r r e c ogni z e s t ha t c onf i de nt i a l i t y i s e s s e nt i a l bot h t o e f f e c t i v e f u n c t i o n i n g o f t h e s e p e e r r e v i e w c o mmi t t e e s a n d t o c o n t i n u e d i mp r o v e me n t i n t h e c a r e a n d t r e a t me n t o f p a t i e n t s .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. THE SHIP RESOLUTION, AND INGERSOLL
2 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1781)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-j-eyring-md-v-fort-sanders-parkwest-medical-tennctapp-1997.