Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided June 4, 1997·No. 03A01-9607-CV-00240·Published

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS

FILED June 4, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr. EDWARD J . EYRI NG, M D. , . ) KNOX CI RCUI T Appellate C ourt Clerk ) C. A. NO. 0 3 A0 1 - 9 6 0 7 - CV- 0 0 2 4 0 Pl a i n t i f f - Ap p e l l a n t ) ) ) ) ) ) vs . ) HON. W HEELER A ROS ENBALM ) J UDGE ) ) ) ) ) FORT SANDERS PARKW EST MEDI CAL ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED CENTER, I NC. , a n d FORT SANDERS ) ALLI ANCE, I NC. , ) ) De f e n d a n t s - Ap p e l l e e s )

J OHN K. KI NG a n d ALAN PARKER, Le wi s , Ki n g , Kr i e g , W l dr op a and Ca t r o n , Kn o x v i l l e f o r Ap p e l l a n t .

FOSTER D. ARNETT a n d RI CK POWERS, Ar n e t t , Dr a p e r a nd Ha g o o d , Kn o x v i l l e , f o r Ap p e l l e e s .

O P I N I O N

M M r r a y, c u J.

W a r e p r i ma r i l y c a l l e d u p o n i n t h i s a p p e a l t o d e c i d e wh e t h e r t h e e

Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w o f 1 9 6 7 ( T. C. A. § 63- 6- 219) ( t he La w)

g r a n t s i mmu n i t y t o h o s p i t a l s f o r a c t i ons t a ke n a ga i ns t phys i c i a ns upon r e c o mme n d a t i o n s of pe e r r e vi e w boar ds or c o mmi t t e e s . Fo r

r e a s o n s h e r e i n a f t e r s t a t e d , we b e l i e v e t h a t t h e l a w wa s i n t e n d e d t o ,

a n d d o e s , g r a n t h o s p i t a l s s u c h i mmu n i t y . W a f f i r m t h e j u d g me n t o f e

t he t r i a l c our t .

Th e pl a i nt i f f / a ppe l l a nt , Ed wa r d J . Ey r i n g , M D. , . is a l i ce ns e d

p h y s i c i a n i n t h e St a t e o f Te n n e s s e e a n d a Bo a r d Ce r t i f i e d Or t h o p e d i c

Su r g e o n . He b e c a me a me mb e r of t he me d i c a l st af f of t he

de f e nda nt / a ppe l l e e , Fo r t Sa n d e r s Pa r k we s t M di c a l e Ce n t e r i n 1974 1 ( Pa r k we s t ) . I n J u l y 1 9 9 2 , Pa r k we s t t e r mi n a t e d h i s p r i v i l e g e s . Dr .

Ey r i n g t he r e a f t e r s ue d Pa r k we s t a l l e gi ng br e a c h of c ont r a c t ,

i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e i n c ont r a c t , i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e i n a n

e xi s t i ng bus i ne s s r e l a t i ons hi p, i nt e nt i ona l i nt e r f e r e nc e in a

pr os pe c t i ve bus i ne s s e xpe c t a nc y, a nd i nt e nt i ona l d i s c r i mi n a t o r y

i nt e r f e r e nc e in hi s r i ght to e nga ge in hi s pr of e s s i on at t he

hos pi t a l .

Th e Ci r c u i t Co u r t f o r Kn o x Co u n t y g r a n t e d t h e d e f e n d a n t s s u mma r y

j u d g me n t , hol di ng t ha t t he hos pi t a l e nj oye d i mmu n i t y under t he

i mmu n i t y p r o v i s i o n o f t h e l a w, ha d not a c t e d i n ba d f a i t h nor wa s

mo t i v a t e d b y ma l i c e , a nd had not vi ol a t e d i t s b y l a ws . Pl a i n t i f f

a ppe a l s , r a i s i n g t h e f o l l o wi n g i s s u e s :

A. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n r e f us i ng t o gr a nt h p a r t i a l s u mma r y j u d g me n t t o Pl a i n t i f f / Ap p e l l a n t u n d e r Le wi s b u r g Co mmu n i t y Ho s p i t a l v . Al f r e d s o n , 8 0 5 S. W 2 d . 7 5 6 ( Te n n . 1 9 9 1 ) o n t h e i s s u e o f c o n t r a c t l i a b i l i t y b a s e d u p o n Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l ' s v i o l a t i o n o f i t s By l a ws .

1 Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l wa s p u r c h a s e d b y Fo r t Sa n d e r s Al l i a n c e i n 1 9 9 0 a n d b e c a me k n o wn a s Fo r t Sa n d e r s Pa r k we s t M d i c a l Ce n t e r . e W her e a f t e r r e f e r t o t he hos pi t a l e a s " Pa r k we s t . "

2 B. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n f a i l i ng t o hol d h t h a t De f e n d a n t s / Ap p e l l e e s we r e n o t e n t i t l e d t o i mmu n i t y u n d e r t h e He a l t h Ca r e Qu a l i t y I mp r o v e me n t Ac t o f 1 9 8 6 , 4 2 U. S. C. § § 1 1 1 0 1 . e t s e q .

C. W e t h e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t e r r e d i n g r a n t i n g s u mma r y h j u d g me n t t o De f e n d a n t s / Ap p e l l e e s g r a n t i n g i t i mmu n i t y f r o m mo n e t a r y l i a b i l i t y u n d e r t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w, T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 .

D. W e t h e r t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w i mmu n i t y h p r o v i s i o n , T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 ( c ) ( 1 ) a p p l i e s t o h o s p i t a l s .

E. W e t h e r T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 ( c ) h p r o v i d e s i mmu n i t y f o r br e a c h of c ont r a c t .

F. W e t he r h t he t r i al c our t ' s a ppl i c a t i on of t he Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w i mp e r mi s s i b l y i n t e r f e r e s wi t h pr e e xi s t i ng cont r a c t r i ght s .

G. W e t h e r Pa r k we s t h f a i l e d t o me e t i t s bur de n of p r o v i n g t h a t i t s a c t i o n s f a l l wi t h i n t h e s t a n d a r d o f t h e Pe e r Re v i e w La w.

H. W e t he r t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n f a i l i ng t o hol d h t h a t Pa r k we s t Ho s p i t a l ' s a c t i o n s we r e n o t ma d e i n g o o d f a i t h b u t o c c u r r e d u n d e r c i r c u ms t a n c e s f r o m wh i c h l e g a l ma l i c e s h o u l d b e i n f e r r e d .

I. W e t h e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s g r a n t o f s u mma r y j u d g me n t h s h o u l d b e r e v e r s e d b e c a u s e Pl a i n t i f f / Ap p e l l a n t wa s de ni e d a n a de qua t e oppor t uni t y t o e nga ge i n di s c ove r y.

J. W e t h e r t h e Pe e r Re v i e w [ La w] s h o u l d b e n u l l i f i e d o n h t he ba s i s of t he doc t r i ne of e qui t a bl e e s t oppe l .

K. W et he r h t he r e voc a t i on of Pl a i n t i f f ' s st af f me mb e r s h i p s h o u l d b e v a c a t e d b y t h e d o c t r i n e s o f Re s J u d i c a t a a n d Co l l a t e r a l Es t o p p e l .

Al t h o u g h pl a i nt i f f e n u me r a t e s e l e ve n i s s ue s , we ar e p r i ma r i l y

c o n c e r n e d wi t h t h e a p p l i c a b i l i t y o f t h e Te n n e s s e e Pe e r Re v i e w La w,

t he r e f or e , we wi l l di s c us s t he i s s ue s r e l a t i ng t o i t fi rst .

THE TENNESSEE PEER REVI EW LAW OF 1 9 6 7

3 T. C. A. § 63- 6- 219 wa s e na c t e d in 1967, a nd is quot e d in its

e n t i r e t y a s f o l l o ws :

T. C. A. § 6 3 - 6 - 2 1 9 . Le g i s l a t i v e pol i c y de c l a r a t i o n — M di c a l e r e v i e w c o mmi t t e e s — I mmuni t y o f me mbe r s — Co nf i de nt i a l i t y o f r e c o r ds - - Sho r t t i t l e . - - ( a ) ( 1 ) I n c o n j u n c t i o n wi t h t h e a p p l i c a b l e p o l i c i e s o f t h e He a l t h Ca r e Qu a l i t y I mp r o v e me n t Ac t o f 1 9 8 6 ( 4 2 U. S. C. § § 1 1 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 5 2 ) , i t i s t h e s t a t e d p o l i c y o f Te n n e s s e e t o e n c o u r a g e c o mmi t t e e s ma d e u p o f Te n n e s s e e ' s l i c e ns e d phys i c i a ns to c a ndi dl y, c ons c i e nt i ous l y, a nd obj e c t i ve l y e va l ua t e a nd r e vi e w t he i r pe e r s ' pr of e s s i ona l c o n d u c t , c o mp e t e n c e , a n d a b i l i t y t o p r a c t i c e me d i c i n e . Te n n e s s e e f ur t he r r e c ogni z e s t ha t c onf i de nt i a l i t y i s e s s e nt i a l bot h t o e f f e c t i v e f u n c t i o n i n g o f t h e s e p e e r r e v i e w c o mmi t t e e s a n d t o c o n t i n u e d i mp r o v e me n t i n t h e c a r e a n d t r e a t me n t o f p a t i e n t s .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc. (Edward J. Eyring, M.D. v. Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center, Inc., and Fort Sanders Alliance, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. THE SHIP RESOLUTION, AND INGERSOLL
2 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1781)