Edward J. Barrett, Jr. v. Chas. H. Tompkins Company

262 F.2d 923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1959
Docket14420_1
StatusPublished

This text of 262 F.2d 923 (Edward J. Barrett, Jr. v. Chas. H. Tompkins Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward J. Barrett, Jr. v. Chas. H. Tompkins Company, 262 F.2d 923 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant, a garage attendant, was seriously injured while using a “man-lift” on his employer’s premises. Workmen’s compensation having been duly paid him, he brought suit for damages against his employer, the builder of the building, the owners of the building (who had leased the premises to the employer), and the manufacturer of the lift. The District Court, after reviewing the pleadings, the deposition of the plaintiff, and certain exhibits, granted summary judgment to the defendants. We find no error affecting substantial rights. Cf. Jamieson v. Woodward & Lothrop, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 32, 247 F.2d 23, certiorari denied, 1957, 355 U.S. 855, 78 S.Ct. 84, 2 L.Ed.2d 63.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & Lothrop
247 F.2d 23 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-j-barrett-jr-v-chas-h-tompkins-company-cadc-1959.