Edward Hills, Sons & Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Edward Hills, Sons & Co. v. United States

127 F. 970, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1903

DocketNo. 3,165

StatusPublished

This text of 127 F. 970 (Edward Hills, Sons & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward Hills, Sons & Co. v. United States, 127 F. 970, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244 (circtsdny 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise herein consisted of certain Chinese oil imported by the petitioners, and assessed by the collector at 25 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 3 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule A, 30 Stat. 151 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627], as,essential oil. The importers protested, claiming that it was free of duty, as “nut oil or oil of nuts,” under paragraph 626 of the same act, Free Gist, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 199 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685J. The Board of General Appraisers sustained the collector’s action, and the importers appealed to this court.

It appears from all the testimony in the case, and from the samples presented to the court for inspection, that the articles from which this,oil is made are nuts, within the ordinary meaning of said term.

The decision of the Board of Appraisers is .therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise herein consisted of certain Chinese oil imported by the petitioners, and assessed by the collector at 25 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 3 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule A, 30 Stat. 151 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627], as,essential oil. The importers protested, claiming that it was free of duty, as “nut oil or oil of nuts,” under paragraph 626 of the same act, Free Gist, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 199 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685J. The Board of General Appraisers sustained the collector’s action, and the importers appealed to this court.

It appears from all the testimony in the case, and from the samples presented to the court for inspection, that the articles from which this,oil is made are nuts, within the ordinary meaning of said term.

The decision of the Board of Appraisers is .therefore reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F. 970, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-hills-sons-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1903.