Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan
This text of 709 F.3d 855 (Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
AMENDED ORDER
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was set by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s orders should be reheard en banc.
A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the panel’s orders en banc, and a vote was conducted. A majority of the active, non-recused judges eligible to vote on the en banc call voted against rehearing the panel’s orders en banc. Therefore, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. En banc proceedings with respect to the orders are concluded. The panel will issue a separate order concerning the petition for panel rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 F.3d 855, 2013 WL 791824, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-harold-schad-v-charles-l-ryan-ca9-2013.