Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan

709 F.3d 855, 2013 WL 791824, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4766
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2013·No. 07-9005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

AMENDED ORDER

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was set by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel’s orders should be reheard en banc.

A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the panel’s orders en banc, and a vote was conducted. A majority of the active, non-recused judges eligible to vote on the en banc call voted against rehearing the panel’s orders en banc. Therefore, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. En banc proceedings with respect to the orders are concluded. The panel will issue a separate order concerning the petition for panel rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan, 709 F.3d 855, 2013 WL 791824, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4766 (9th Cir. 2013).

709 F.3d 855 (Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. Schad
570 U.S. 521 (Supreme Court, 2013)