Edward H. Russell and Doris B. Russell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fifth Circuit

Edward H. Russell and Doris B. Russell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

345 F.2d 534, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1107, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5394

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 1, 1965

Docket21281_1

StatusPublished

This text of 345 F.2d 534 (Edward H. Russell and Doris B. Russell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward H. Russell and Doris B. Russell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 345 F.2d 534, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1107, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5394 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

345 F.2d 534

Edward H. RUSSELL and Doris B. Russell, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 21281.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 1, 1965.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Mississippi).

C. Delbert Hosemann and Brunini, Everett, Grantham & Quin, Vicksburg, Miss., for petitioners.

Ralph A. Muoio, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry Baum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Sheldon S. Cohen, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Charles Owen Johnson, Atty., I. R. S., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

There is little or nothing we can say to add to the opinion of the Tax Court. 40 T.C. 810. We adopt that opinion as our own opinion and affirm the decision of the Tax Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI