Edward Guerra v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Edward Guerra v. State

DecidedJanuary 9, 2018

Docket01-17-00464-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Edward Guerra v. State (Edward Guerra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edward Guerra v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-17-00464-CR Style: Edward Guerra v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: December 27, 2017 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Anders Response Party filing motion: Pro se appellant Edward Guerra Document to be filed: Anders Response

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 23, 2017 (set before receipt of records) Number of extensions granted: 2 Current due date: January 17, 2018 Date requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:  Granted, in part If document is to be filed, document due: January 29, 2018.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s third pro se motion for an extension of time to file his pro se Anders response is granted, in part, because appellant believes that “two motions have been filed with this Court, awaiting [r]esponse,” but appellant is warned that no further extensions will be granted. Other than appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, appellant is advised that there are no other pending motions filed by appellant, pro se or otherwise, in this Court. Accordingly, if appellant’s pro se response is not filed by January 29, 2018, the Clerk of this Court will mark this case ready for submission without the response.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting for the Court Date: January 9, 2017

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-17-00464-CR Style: Edward Guerra v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: December 27, 2017 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Anders Response Party filing motion: Pro se appellant Edward Guerra Document to be filed: Anders Response

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 23, 2017 (set before receipt of records) Number of extensions granted: 2 Current due date: January 17, 2018 Date requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:  Granted, in part If document is to be filed, document due: January 29, 2018.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s third pro se motion for an extension of time to file his pro se Anders response is granted, in part, because appellant believes that “two motions have been filed with this Court, awaiting [r]esponse,” but appellant is warned that no further extensions will be granted. Other than appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, appellant is advised that there are no other pending motions filed by appellant, pro se or otherwise, in this Court. Accordingly, if appellant’s pro se response is not filed by January 29, 2018, the Clerk of this Court will mark this case ready for submission without the response.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting for the Court Date: January 9, 2017

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Edward Guerra v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-guerra-v-state-texapp-2018.