Edward G. Rizk v. J. Cary Gray, Individually and as Independent and President of Rizk Interest, Ltd and Rizk Interest, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 2016·No. 01-16-00374-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Edward G. Rizk filed a motion to recuse Judge Loyd Wright. Judge Wright declined to recuse himself and referred the motion to the Honorable Guy Herman, Presiding Judge of the Statutory Probate Courts, for assignment of a judge to hear the motion. The Honorable Gladys Burwell was appointed and denied the motion by order signed April 5, 2016.

An appellate court lacks jurisdiction over appeals from interlocutory orders unless a statute provides for an appeal. See Guilbot v. de Gonzalez, 367 S.W.3d 442, 447 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, pet. denied). No statute provides for appeal of an interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse, and therefore, it is appealable only on appeal of the final judgment. See id.; Joannides v. Joannides, No. 01–13–00090–CV, 2013 WL 1222584, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 26, 2013, no pet.). Because the record indicates no final judgment has been signed, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.

We dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward G. Rizk v. J. Cary Gray, Individually and as Independent and President of Rizk Interest, Ltd and Rizk Interest, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Edward G. Rizk v. J. Cary Gray, Individually and as Independent and President of Rizk Interest, Ltd and Rizk Interest, Ltd. (Edward G. Rizk v. J. Cary Gray, Individually and as Independent and President of Rizk Interest, Ltd and Rizk Interest, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guilbot v. de Gonzalez
367 S.W.3d 442 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)