Edward G. Corella v. United States

455 F.2d 1381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10393
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 30, 1972·No. 71-2617·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Corella brought this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his conviction and subsequent probation revocation. The district court, after holding an evidentiary hearing, determined the factual issues against Corella and, accordingly, entered an order denying the claim. Corella appeals.

We hold that the Government sustained its burden of proving that Corella waived his right to counsel, appointed or retained, at the 1955 and 1959 court appearances despite his testimony to the contrary. Likewise, we conclude, the Government met its burden of proving that Corella understood the consequences of his plea. See Yesterday v. United States, 442 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1971). His argument that the trial court was under a misapprehension as to its powers when it imposed the previously suspended sentence is not supported by the *1382 record. The claim that there was an undue delay in executing the probation revocation warrant is not well taken. See United States v. Bartholdi, 453 F.2d 1225 (9th Cir. 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edward G. Corella v. United States, 455 F.2d 1381, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10393 (9th Cir. 1972).

455 F.2d 1381 (Edward G. Corella v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ambrose Yesterday v. United States
442 F.2d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. William Bartholdi
453 F.2d 1225 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)