Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 572, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1299
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; first, second and fourth questions certified answered in the negative; third and and fifth questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Crane, J., concurs on ground that this is not a motion for substitution of. parties, but to bring in a new party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 572, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1299 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 739 (Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawrey v. . Hines
142 N.E. 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)