Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 572, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1299
This text of 139 N.E. 739 (Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edward Dubied Co. v. . the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 572, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1299 (N.Y. 1923).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; first, second and fourth questions certified answered in the negative; third and and fifth questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Crane, J., concurs on ground that this is not a motion for substitution of. parties, but to bring in a new party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawrey v. . Hines
142 N.E. 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 N.E. 739, 235 N.Y. 572, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-dubied-co-v-the-pennsylvania-railroad-co-ny-1923.