Edward Christopher Williams and Ethel LeGwen Williams v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC
This text of Edward Christopher Williams and Ethel LeGwen Williams v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC (Edward Christopher Williams and Ethel LeGwen Williams v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 30, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00163-CV ——————————— EDWARD WILLIAMS AND ETHEL WILLIAMS, Appellants V. CATAMOUNT PROPERTIES 2018, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1217703
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Edward Williams and Ethel Williams, filed a notice of appeal
from the trial court’s February 15, 2024 order. Appellants have failed to timely file
a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The clerk’s record was filed on March 20, 2024, and on April 15, 2024, the
court reporter notified the Court that no record was taken in this case. Accordingly,
appellants’ brief was due to be filed on or before May 16, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a). Appellants did not file an appellants’ brief.
On August 15, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that this appeal
was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was
filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of
appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of
prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply
with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond to the August 15, 2024 notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edward Christopher Williams and Ethel LeGwen Williams v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-christopher-williams-and-ethel-legwen-williams-v-catamount-texapp-2024.