Edward Charles Lister v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 9, 2004
Docket13-04-00576-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Edward Charles Lister v. State (Edward Charles Lister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Charles Lister v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion


NUMBER 13-04-576-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________ _____________________


EDWARD LISTER,                                                             Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

_____________________________________________ _____________________


On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

______________________________________________ ____________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, EDWARD LISTER, attempts to appeal a conviction for theft. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

         On November 1, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

         On November 22, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

         The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.


                                                      PER CURIAM



Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 9th day of December, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edward Charles Lister v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-charles-lister-v-state-texapp-2004.