Edward Chappell Company v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Norfolk & Western Railway Company
This text of 202 F.2d 149 (Edward Chappell Company v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Norfolk & Western Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
202 F.2d 149
EDWARD CHAPPELL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY and Norfolk & Western
Railway Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 146, Docket 22546.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 14, 1953.
Decided Jan. 29, 1953.
Foley & Martin, New York City (Christopher E. Heckman, William J. O'Brien and Francis A. Wade, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
White & Case, New York City (Horace L. Walker, Hewitt Biaett, Richmond, Va. and Robert H. Pratt, Hartsdale, N.Y., of counsel), for Chesapeake & O.R. Co.
Bernard Sobol and Conboy Hewitt O'Brien & Boardman, New York City (R. B. Claytor and J. P. Fishwick, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Norfolk & W.R. Co.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below, D.C., 110 F.Supp. 46.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 F.2d 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-chappell-company-v-chesapeake-ohio-railway--ca2-1953.