Edward B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Construction Corp. v. County of Suffolk
This text of 534 N.E.2d 315 (Edward B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Construction Corp. v. County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the complaint as against respondent Converse Ward David Dixon denied; motion otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order insofar as it dismissed the complaint as against respondents Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh and Associates does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
534 N.E.2d 315, 73 N.Y.2d 807, 537 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-b-fitzpatrick-jr-construction-corp-v-county-of-suffolk-ny-1988.