Eduardo Wilkinson, M.D. P.A. and Individially v. Richardson Hospital Authority

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 12, 2021
Docket05-12-01515-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Eduardo Wilkinson, M.D. P.A. and Individially v. Richardson Hospital Authority (Eduardo Wilkinson, M.D. P.A. and Individially v. Richardson Hospital Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eduardo Wilkinson, M.D. P.A. and Individially v. Richardson Hospital Authority, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 12, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01515-CV

EDUARDO WILKINSON, M.D. P.A. AND INDIVIDIALLY, Appellant V. RICHARDSON HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-02678-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns We reinstate this appeal. In 2013, we abated this case due to bankruptcy. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public

Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which shows the bankruptcy

case associated with this appeal was terminated on November 7, 2013, effectively

dissolving the automatic stay.

We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status

of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To

date, neither party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this

appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1

(Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for

publication).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

121515F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

EDUARDO WILKINSON, M.D. On Appeal from the County Court at P.A. AND INDIVIDIALLY, Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Appellant Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-02678- E. No. 05-12-01515-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Smith RICHARDSON HOSPITAL participating. AUTHORITY, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered May 12, 2021

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eduardo Wilkinson, M.D. P.A. and Individially v. Richardson Hospital Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduardo-wilkinson-md-pa-and-individially-v-richardson-hospital-texapp-2021.