Eduardo Rodriguez v. James D. Purkett, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center

65 F.3d 172, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30574, 1995 WL 510006
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 30, 1995·No. 94-3373·Unpublished

Opinion

65 F.3d 172

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Eduardo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
James D. PURKETT, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional
Center, Appellee.

No. 94-3373.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 3, 1995.
Filed: Aug. 30, 1995.

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Rodriguez appeals from the district court's1 order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition claiming violation of his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. Rodriguez's Fourth Amendment claim is barred. See Poole v. Wood, 45 F.3d 246, 249 (8th Cir.) (citing Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 481-82 (1976)), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 2561 (1995). As to the other claim, we conclude that, even assuming the facts as Rodriguez alleged them, there was no Fifth Amendment violation. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Russell G. Clark, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eduardo Rodriguez v. James D. Purkett, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center, 65 F.3d 172, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30574, 1995 WL 510006 (8th Cir. 1995).

65 F.3d 172 (Eduardo Rodriguez v. James D. Purkett, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Powell
428 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 1976)
James Robinson Poole v. Frank W. Wood
45 F.3d 246 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)