Eduardo P.G. v. Warden of the California City Detention Center, et al.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 EDUARDO P.G.,1 No. 1:26-cv-04280-TLN-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DETENTION CENTER, et al. 15 Respondents. 16
17 Petitioner Eduardo P.G. (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is representing 18 himself, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) 19 Petitioner also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2). 20 The Court finds Petitioner has made the requisite showing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to 21 proceed in forma pauperis. Thus, Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 2) is hereby GRANTED. 22 Additionally, in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the Court has 23 determined that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel for Petitioner. See 18 24 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 1 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of 26 the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits Petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initials, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum re: 27 Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Judicial Conference of the United States (May 1, 2018), 28 https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/18-cv-l-suggestion_cacm_0.pdf. 1 Therefore, within seven (7) court days from the date of this Order, the appointing authority for 2 the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to 3 Michele Krueger, Courtroom Deputy for Chief Judge Troy Nunley, via email at 4 mkrueger@caed.uscourts.gov, who shall update the docket to reflect counsel’s appointment. If 5 counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of California Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”) Panel, 6 the Court hereby authorizes them to serve as CJA counsel for petitioner for the duration of the 7 proceedings in this Court pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(1). 9 Date: June 9, 2026 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eduardo P.G. v. Warden of the California City Detention Center, et al. (Eduardo P.G. v. Warden of the California City Detention Center, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.