EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC
This text of EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC (EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1087 Lower Tribunal No. 14-7686 ________________
Eduardo Orozco, Appellant,
vs.
McCormick 105, LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.
ADR Miami LLC, and Juan Ramirez, Jr., for appellant.
Law Firm of Gary M. Singer, P.A., and Gary M. Singer (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McCormack v. Flens, 27 So. 3d 179, 181 (Fla. 2d DCA
2010) (affirming jury verdict and finding that defendant’s refusal to return
funds after acknowledging that they belonged to plaintiff satisfied the
felonious intent requirement); see also Masvidal v. Ochoa, 505 So. 2d 555,
556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (holding that that the defendant committed
embezzlement, conversion, and civil theft where “the defendant lawfully
obtained possession of the plaintiff’s funds to set up the escrow fund and
thereafter converted the funds for his own use”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduardo-orozco-v-mccormick-105-llc-fladistctapp-2021.