EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 2021·No. 20-1087·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1087 Lower Tribunal No. 14-7686 ________________

Eduardo Orozco, Appellant,

vs.

McCormick 105, LLC, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.

ADR Miami LLC, and Juan Ramirez, Jr., for appellant.

Law Firm of Gary M. Singer, P.A., and Gary M. Singer (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McCormack v. Flens, 27 So. 3d 179, 181 (Fla. 2d DCA

2010) (affirming jury verdict and finding that defendant’s refusal to return

funds after acknowledging that they belonged to plaintiff satisfied the

felonious intent requirement); see also Masvidal v. Ochoa, 505 So. 2d 555,

556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (holding that that the defendant committed

embezzlement, conversion, and civil theft where “the defendant lawfully

obtained possession of the plaintiff’s funds to set up the escrow fund and

thereafter converted the funds for his own use”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC (EDUARDO OROZCO v. MCCORMICK 105, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCormack v. FLENS
27 So. 3d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Masvidal v. Ochoa
505 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)