Eduardo Lopez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 20, 2006
Docket13-06-00188-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eduardo Lopez v. State (Eduardo Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eduardo Lopez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-06-188-CR

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________ _

EDUARDO LOPEZ,                                                   Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

                  On appeal from the 105th District Court

                           of Kleberg County, Texas.

______________________________________________________    

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

   Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, EDUARDO LOPEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a purported order entered by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause no. 05-AC-0468.  The clerk=s record was received on April 24, 2006. 


Upon review of the clerk=s record, it did not appear that an appealable order had been entered by the trial court.  Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  To date, appellant has failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20th day of July, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eduardo Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduardo-lopez-v-state-texapp-2006.