Eduardo Hernandez-Miranda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

124 F.3d 211, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31423
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 1997
Docket96-70784
StatusUnpublished

This text of 124 F.3d 211 (Eduardo Hernandez-Miranda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eduardo Hernandez-Miranda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 124 F.3d 211, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31423 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

124 F.3d 211

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Eduardo HERNANDEZ-MIRANDA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 96-70784.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 1997.**
Decided Sept. 15, 1997.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Aum-bsq-dtk.

Before HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Eduardo Hernandez-Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant: to section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). Hernandez-Miranda was found deportable under section 241(a)(4) of the INA based on his convictions for two crimes involving moral turpitude, not arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct. Under the Technical Amendment made by Illegal Immigrant Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act § 306(d), this court may not review petitions of aliens who have committed, at any time after entry, multiple crimes involving moral turpitude for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed. See Perez v. INS, 116 F.3d 405, 407 (9th Cir.1997). In this case, both of Hernandez-Miranda's convictions, one for armed robbery and the other for attempted second degree murder, involved sentences of more than five years. Accordingly, we dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction. See id.

DISMISSED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 F.3d 211, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduardo-hernandez-miranda-v-immigration-and-natura-ca9-1997.