Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco
This text of Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco (Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00918-CV Style: Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco Date motion filed*: November 21, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file the record Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellate record
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 23, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: 30 days
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ If additional time is necessary, the Court may extend the deadline to file the clerk’s or reporter’s record if the trial court clerk or court reporter requests an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3.(c). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: December 2, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduardo-franco-v-stacey-franco-texapp-2014.