Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00918-CV Style: Eduardo Franco v. Stacey Franco

Date motion filed*: November 21, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file the record Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellate record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 23, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: 30 days

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ If additional time is necessary, the Court may extend the deadline to file the clerk’s or reporter’s record if the trial court clerk or court reporter requests an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3.(c). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 2, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision