Eduardo Delemaria Ety Al v. Citibank, N.A.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ February 14, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13A0874. EDUARDO DELAMARIA et al. v. CITIBANK, N.A.
This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After an adverse ruling, Eduardo and Celia Delamaria appealed the magistrate court’s decision to the superior court. The superior court subsequently entered a writ of possession in favor of Citibank. The Delamarias then appealed directly to this Court. We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the Delamarias were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 02/14/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eduardo Delemaria Ety Al v. Citibank, N.A. (Eduardo Delemaria Ety Al v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.