Eduardo D. v. State

11 Tex. Ct. App. 410
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1882·Published

Opinion

White, P. J.

An affidavit or complaint was made before the county judge, charging the appellants with libel. Ho information based upon said affidavit was ever brought or presented in the County Court, and appellants were tried alone on the complaint without an information. It is true that it is provided in section 17, article 5 of the Constitution, that “Prosecutions may be commenced in said court (county) by information filed by the county attorney, or by affidavit, as may be provided by law; ” but we are not aware that any provision of law has as yet been passed authorizing the prosecution of misdemeanors in the County Court simply by affidavit or complaint. On the contrary, it is expressly provided that “ All offenses known to the penal law of this State-must be prosecuted by indictment or information. This provision does not include fines and penalties for con[411]*411tempt of court, nor special cases in which inferior courts exercise jurisdiction.” Code Crim. Proc. art. 418.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eduardo D. v. State, 11 Tex. Ct. App. 410 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

11 Tex. Ct. App. 410 (Eduardo D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.