Eduardo A. Trevino v. Cheryl Lawson, Charles E. Monroe, Norris Jackson, Tamra McColluch, Sandra Castenada
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00708-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
EDUARDO A. TREVINO, Appellant,
v.
CHERYL LAWSON, CHARLES E. MONROE, NORRIS JACKSON, TAMRA MCCOLLUCH, SANDRA CASTENADA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Eduardo A. Trevino, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the
343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-12-1124-CV-C. Appellant
has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal and requests that this Court withdraw the appeal
without prejudice. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to
withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the
appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions
are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 17th day of January, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eduardo A. Trevino v. Cheryl Lawson, Charles E. Monroe, Norris Jackson, Tamra McColluch, Sandra Castenada (Eduardo A. Trevino v. Cheryl Lawson, Charles E. Monroe, Norris Jackson, Tamra McColluch, Sandra Castenada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.