Eduard Falks v. Willis H. Snyder

380 F.2d 735, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5696
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 1967
Docket21092
StatusPublished

This text of 380 F.2d 735 (Eduard Falks v. Willis H. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eduard Falks v. Willis H. Snyder, 380 F.2d 735, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5696 (9th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Having examined the record and the briefs of counsel, we are satisfied that appellant failed to discharge his burden of showing that the by-law of the Guam Memorial Hospital specifying the requirements for appointment to its medical staff were arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory, or beyond the authority of the Board of Trustees.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 F.2d 735, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eduard-falks-v-willis-h-snyder-ca9-1967.