Edson v. American Bank Note Co.

56 Barb. 96, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 56 Barb. 96 (Edson v. American Bank Note Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edson v. American Bank Note Co., 56 Barb. 96, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

Opinion

Ingraham, P. J.

In this case the plaintiff sues the defendants for moneys collected by them as royalty for the use of the patented ink known as the “ green tint,” which he claims as due to him as the owner of the patent right. The referee held that he was not entitled to recover, and rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

The questions raised in this case are depending on the the same principles as those which govern the case of the American Bank Note Co. v. Edson, decided at this term,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Barb. 96, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edson-v-american-bank-note-co-nysupct-1870.