Edsall v. Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation
50 N.Y. 661, 1872 N.Y. LEXIS 483
Opinion
reads opinion for reversal. Allen, Grover and Rapallo, JJ., concur; Peckham J., not sitting. Folger and Andrews, JJ., did not hear argument.
Order reversed and judgment below affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edsall v. Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation, 50 N.Y. 661, 1872 N.Y. LEXIS 483 (N.Y. 1872).
50 N.Y. 661 (Edsall v. Camden and Amboy Railroad and Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Coachman
59 Fla. 130 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Rosenstein v. . Vogemann
77 N.E. 625 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Russell v. Erie Railroad
67 L.R.A. 433 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)
Robinson v. New York & Texas Steamship Co.
63 A.D. 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Steinhardt v. . Baker
57 N.E. 629 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Teachers' Building & Loan Ass'n v. Severance
41 A.D. 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Constable v. National Steamship Co.
154 U.S. 51 (Supreme Court, 1894)