Edrington v. Leach
This text of 34 Tex. 285 (Edrington v. Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leach sued Edrington in the district court, on an account for work and labor.
If, upon the trial, it was proven that the value of Leach’s services in Edrington’a store, as bookkeeper, was estimated at eight hundred dollars per annum, and that the parties had agreed that Leach should work for Edrington but half his time and receive hut half pay, evidence proving that he worked all or more than half his time would warrant the conclusion that the parties had changed their original agreement, and Leach would be entitled to recover for so much of his time as he gave to Edrington’s business, at the rate of eight hundred dollars- per year.
We cannot see wherein the charge of the court was erroneous;, and the verdict of the jury is not without evidence to support it
The judgment of the district court is- affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Tex. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edrington-v-leach-tex-1871.