Ednom Securities Corp. v. Rockaway Construction Co.
This text of 230 A.D. 726 (Ednom Securities Corp. v. Rockaway Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, in so far as it grants the motion of the plaintiff with respect to the first defense and first counterclaim alleged in appellant’s answer, and strikes out the said defense and counterclaim, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion in said respect denied, with ten dollars costs. The allegations as to usury contained in appellant’s answer under her first separate defense are sufficient to raise an issue as to the validity of the transaction in question. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ednom-securities-corp-v-rockaway-construction-co-nyappdiv-1930.