Edner v. Mathews

Third Circuit

Edner v. Mathews

151 F.2d 335

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 16, 1945·No. Nos. 8886, 8887·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These two cases come to the Court from judgments of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. They involve several questions, all of which we think are questions of fact. Upon these questions there was conflicting testimony and each side points to facts tending to support the conclusion it urges. We quite realize that the questions are arguable. But the District Judge, having all the testimony before him, resolved it in well defined conclusions. We think that all of his conclusions are supported by such evidence and that we could not say, if we would, that they are clearly erroneous.

The judgments are, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These two cases come to the Court from judgments of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. They involve several questions, all of which we think are questions of fact. Upon these questions there was conflicting testimony and each side points to facts tending to support the conclusion it urges. We quite realize that the questions are arguable. But the District Judge, having all the testimony before him, resolved it in well defined conclusions. We think that all of his conclusions are supported by such evidence and that we could not say, if we would, that they are clearly erroneous.

The judgments are, therefore, affirmed.

Edner v. Mathews, 151 F.2d 335 (3d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

151 F.2d 335 (Edner v. Mathews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.