Edna Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc

324 F.2d 956, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3515
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 5, 1963·No. 14394·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

324 F.2d 956

Edna VAN der SCHELLING, Appellant,
v.
U. S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, INC.

No. 14394.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued November 18, 1963.

Decided December 5, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Joseph S. Lord, III, Judge.

Harry Lore, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dorfman, Pechner, Sacks & Dorfman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

James H. McGlothlin, Washington, D. C. (Philip H. Strubing, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., David B. Isbell, Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Joseph S. Lord, III, in his excellent Opinion, reported at 213 F. Supp. 756 (E.D.Pa.1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edna Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc, 324 F.2d 956, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3515 (3d Cir. 1963).

324 F.2d 956 (Edna Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Wit v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, N.V.
570 F. Supp. 613 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Dadzie Ex Rel. International Kal-Sahara Corp. v. Leslie
550 F. Supp. 77 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Sadat v. Mertes
615 F.2d 1176 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Sadat v. Mertes
464 F. Supp. 1311 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1979)
Mohr v. Allen
407 F. Supp. 483 (S.D. New York, 1976)