Edna Morales v. Ricardo Ramon

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 16, 2009
Docket13-08-00584-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Edna Morales v. Ricardo Ramon (Edna Morales v. Ricardo Ramon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edna Morales v. Ricardo Ramon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-00584-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

EDNA MORALES, Appellant,



v.



RICARDO RAMON, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Edna Morales, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. F-252-04-E. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Additionally, the Clerk of the Court advised appellant that the notice of appeal referenced a date of judgment that is not contained in the clerk's record and instructed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the trial court within ten days from receipt of the letter. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3. Appellant was notified that failure to file an amended notice of appeal would result in the appeal being dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant has failed to correct the defects or otherwise respond to the Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1; 42.3(b),(c).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 16th day of April, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edna Morales v. Ricardo Ramon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edna-morales-v-ricardo-ramon-texapp-2009.