Edna M. Knobel, Administratrix of the Estate of Karl G. Knobel, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation

Third Circuit

Edna M. Knobel, Administratrix of the Estate of Karl G. Knobel, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation

296 F.2d 737, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 6330

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 3, 1962·No. 13632_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of negligence on the part of the defendant railroad company was a close one. We are convinced, however, that the court below did not err in sending it to the jury which returned a substantial verdict for the plaintiff. The railroad company attacks that verdict not only as excessive but as unsupported by *738 the evidence. With neither of these contentions can we agree. After thorough examination, since we perceive no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment, D.C., 192 F.Supp. 771, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The issue of negligence on the part of the defendant railroad company was a close one. We are convinced, however, that the court below did not err in sending it to the jury which returned a substantial verdict for the plaintiff. The railroad company attacks that verdict not only as excessive but as unsupported by *738 the evidence. With neither of these contentions can we agree. After thorough examination, since we perceive no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment, D.C., 192 F.Supp. 771, will be affirmed.

Edna M. Knobel, Administratrix of the Estate of Karl G. Knobel, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation, 296 F.2d 737, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 6330 (3d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

296 F.2d 737 (Edna M. Knobel, Administratrix of the Estate of Karl G. Knobel, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related