Edna Garcia AKA Edna Jane Marquez v. State
This text of Edna Garcia AKA Edna Jane Marquez v. State (Edna Garcia AKA Edna Jane Marquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 30, 1998
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Edna Garcia, also known as Edna Jane Marquez, filed a pro se motion to permit late
filing of her notice of appeal. She did not timely file a motion for extension of time. Because
the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain both
Garcia's motion and her appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App.
1996) (explaining that both the notice of appeal and the motion for extension of time must
be filed within the fifteen-day extension); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802
S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from
felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss Garcia's motion and appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
4th Court of Appeals Opinions
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edna Garcia AKA Edna Jane Marquez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edna-garcia-aka-edna-jane-marquez-v-state-texapp-1998.