Edn. Resources Inst. v. Grover, Unpublished Decision (6-7-2004)
Opinion
{¶ 3} It is from this judgment entry appellant appeals raising the following assignments of error:
{¶ 4} "I. Trial judge unjustly enriched plaintiff/appellee, defendant's exhibit dd.
{¶ 5} "II. Trial judge addressed no issues presented by defendant/appellant as stated in the "issues presented" paragraph, concerning amount, interest, and payment.
{¶ 6} "III. Trial judge misapplied evidence of defendant/appellant to the prejudice of defendant/appellant, defendant's exhibit e and `judgment entry granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.'
{¶ 7} "IV. Trial judge accepted all plaintiff/appellee claims without sufficient evidence `judgment entry granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.'"
{¶ 8} Appellant did not attach proof of service to his Brief filed with this Court as required by App. R. 13(D).1 Accordingly, we dismiss appellant's appeal for want of prosecution. See, App. R. 18(C).
Hoffman, J., Gwin, P.J. and Farmer, J. concur.
For the reason stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, appellant's appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs assessed to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2004 Ohio 3057 (Edn. Resources Inst. v. Grover, Unpublished Decision (6-7-2004)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.