Edmunson v. State
927 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152, 2006 WL 1144226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 2006
DocketNo. 5D05-131
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 927 So. 2d 204 (Edmunson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edmunson v. State, 927 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152, 2006 WL 1144226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See State v. Espinosa, 686 So.2d 1345, 1348-49 (Fla.1996) (holding a defendant who requests an instruction on a lesser-included offense cannot contest the sufficiency of the evidence on the lesser-included offense when sufficient evidence exists to convict the defendant for the greater offense).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Department of Children and Families v. As
927 So. 2d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
927 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152, 2006 WL 1144226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmunson-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.