Edmunson v. Eugene Plywood Company

200 P.2d 949, 184 Or. 683, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 255
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 200 P.2d 949 (Edmunson v. Eugene Plywood Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmunson v. Eugene Plywood Company, 200 P.2d 949, 184 Or. 683, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 255 (Or. 1948).

Opinion

*684 LUSK, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a tract of land 138.17 acres in area in Lane County, Oregon. They brought this action to recover from the defendants the sum of $98,550.00 damages alleged to have been caused by water negligently permitted to escape from log ponds built and maintained by the defendants and reaching the plaintiffs’ land.

The case was tried to the court without a jury under a stipulation that the evidence in the case of Conger et al. v. Eugene Plywood Company et al., 200 P. 2d 936, this day decided, should apply so far as applicable. The court considered and decided the two cases together, and in each entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and a judgment favorable to defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment in the instant case.

The evidence to support the allegations of the amended complaint, on which the case was tried, as to the alleged negligence of the defendants and the cause of injury to plaintiffs’ land, is the same as that in the Conger case. The findings of fact are identical save for the findings identifying the parties and describing the land. Upon the question whether there is substantial evidence to support the Circuit Court’s findings *685 to the effect that the defendants’ ponds have not leaked and that water from snch ponds has not reached the plaintiffs’ land, the opinion in the Conger case is applicable here; and since, as shown in the opinion in that case, there is substantial evidence to support the findings, they are binding on this court.- Sexton v. Kelly, 200 P. 2d 950, this day decided; Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co., 149 Or. 126, 211, 40 P. (2d) 703.

It follows that there should be the same decision, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conger v. Eugene Plywood Co.
200 P.2d 936 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)
Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.
40 P.2d 703 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1934)
Sexton v. Kelly
200 P.2d 950 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 P.2d 949, 184 Or. 683, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmunson-v-eugene-plywood-company-or-1948.