Edmundson v. Yates

25 Tex. 373
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 373 (Edmundson v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edmundson v. Yates, 25 Tex. 373 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

Where a note is given to a firm “or bearer,” and a suit is brought upon it by some one who holds and owns it in the course of trade, as the bearer thereof, and his name is set out in full as the plaintiff in the suit, it is not necessary to set out the full names of the payees, otherwise than as they are written in the note.

The judgment is excessive, being for an amount exceeding that [374]*374due at the date of the judgment about §2 50. A remittitur of three dollars has been filed, but not until the parties appeared in this court. This having been assigned as error, the judgment must be reversed and judgment rendered here for the correct amount.

Reversed and judgment rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas Employers' Insurance v. Lightfoot
162 S.W.2d 929 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Barton v. Pochyla
243 S.W. 785 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Holloway Seed Co. v. City National Bank
47 S.W. 95 (Texas Supreme Court, 1898)
Fry v. Longstreet & Sedgwick
1 White & W. 24 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Brown v. Hunter
38 Tex. 626 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmundson-v-yates-tex-1860.